进攻/防守实力
N
Team
P
Overall
Att.
Def.
Home
Att.
Def.
Away
Att.
Def.
Regular Season
1
里加
22
1.45
0.49
1.28
0.48
2.25
0.37
2
里加FS
22
1.48
0.76
1.45
0.38
2.04
0.84
3
Auda
22
0.92
0.88
1.12
0.76
0.98
0.73
4
利耶帕亚
22
1.01
1.25
1.06
0.76
1.29
1.28
5
陶格夫皮尔斯
22
0.87
1.55
1.06
1.37
0.91
1.28
6
FS Jelgava
22
0.53
0.95
0.95
0.83
0.15
0.78
7
Super Nova
22
0.73
1.18
0.82
1.11
0.83
0.92
8
Grobiņa
22
0.56
1.59
0.78
1.29
0.46
1.40
9
Tukums
22
0.65
1.52
0.86
1.67
0.63
1.03
10
梅塔里加
22
0.50
1.63
0.55
1.50
0.63
1.28
110
Average
1.63
1.2
- UEFA Champions League Qualifiers
- UEFA Conference League Qualifiers
- Relegation Play-off
- Relegation
Example: If attack strength of team is 1.25 that team is scoring 25% more goals than average goals.Attack value over 1.00 is better and for defence under 1.00 is better. More details...
Last update 2025-07-15 10:42:00
Last update 2025-07-15 10:42:00
目标分配
N
Team
0-15
15-30
30-45
45-60
60-75
75-90
0-45
45-90
GF
GA
Regular Season
1
里加
7 0
9 2
5 1
8 4
11 4
12 3
21 3
31 11
52
13
2
里加FS
9 3
6 1
6 0
14 7
8 1
10 8
21 4
32 16
53
20
3
Auda
1 6
7 3
3 5
11 3
4 3
7 3
11 14
22 9
33
23
4
利耶帕亚
4 3
10 5
8 0
3 13
3 6
10 8
22 8
16 27
36
33
5
陶格夫皮尔斯
7 5
3 4
2 8
5 7
5 7
9 10
12 17
19 24
31
41
6
FS Jelgava
2 3
3 4
3 2
3 3
1 4
7 9
8 9
11 16
19
25
7
Super Nova
3 4
2 6
3 7
7 7
3 3
9 5
8 17
19 15
26
31
8
Grobiņa
3 9
3 6
4 4
3 7
3 6
5 11
10 19
11 24
20
42
9
Tukums
4 3
2 10
6 4
6 7
2 5
4 11
12 17
12 23
23
40
10
梅塔里加
2 6
2 6
1 10
4 6
5 6
5 10
5 22
14 22
18
43
42
47
41
64
45
78
130
187
- UEFA Champions League Qualifiers
- UEFA Conference League Qualifiers
- Relegation Play-off
- Relegation
Numbers in black are golas scored. Gray numbers are conceded goals.