进攻/防守实力
N
Team
P
Overall
Att.
Def.
Home
Att.
Def.
Away
Att.
Def.
Regular Season
1
里加
24
1.47
0.58
1.30
0.56
2.23
0.44
2
里加FS
24
1.59
0.75
1.62
0.47
2.11
0.76
3
利耶帕亚
24
1.01
1.22
1.07
0.82
1.27
1.27
4
Auda
24
0.86
0.96
1.06
0.88
0.88
0.76
5
陶格夫皮尔斯
24
0.91
1.43
1.06
1.22
1.02
1.21
6
FS Jelgava
24
0.50
0.92
0.91
0.75
0.14
0.81
7
Super Nova
24
0.66
1.09
0.75
1.00
0.74
0.88
8
Tukums
24
0.69
1.60
0.88
1.56
0.69
1.21
9
Grobiņa
24
0.53
1.49
0.77
1.27
0.44
1.26
10
梅塔里加
24
0.50
1.70
0.50
1.63
0.69
1.30
120
Average
1.65
1.23
- UEFA Champions League Qualifiers
- UEFA Conference League Qualifiers
- Relegation Play-off
- Relegation
Example: If attack strength of team is 1.25 that team is scoring 25% more goals than average goals.Attack value over 1.00 is better and for defence under 1.00 is better. More details...
Last update 2025-07-31 14:24:00
Last update 2025-07-31 14:24:00
目标分配
N
Team
0-15
15-30
30-45
45-60
60-75
75-90
0-45
45-90
GF
GA
Regular Season
1
里加
8 1
10 2
7 1
9 5
11 5
13 4
25 4
33 14
58
17
2
里加FS
10 3
7 1
8 2
17 7
9 1
12 8
25 6
38 16
63
22
3
利耶帕亚
5 4
11 5
8 1
3 13
5 6
10 9
24 10
18 28
40
36
4
Auda
1 6
7 4
3 5
11 4
4 5
8 4
11 15
23 13
34
28
5
陶格夫皮尔斯
8 5
3 4
2 8
6 7
6 7
11 11
13 17
23 25
36
42
6
FS Jelgava
3 4
3 4
3 2
3 3
1 4
7 10
9 10
11 17
20
27
7
Super Nova
3 5
2 6
3 7
7 7
3 3
9 5
8 18
19 15
26
32
8
Tukums
4 3
2 11
8 5
7 10
2 6
5 12
14 19
14 28
27
47
9
Grobiņa
3 9
3 6
4 4
3 8
4 6
5 12
10 19
12 26
21
44
10
梅塔里加
2 7
2 7
1 12
5 7
5 7
6 11
5 26
16 25
20
50
47
50
47
71
50
86
144
207
- UEFA Champions League Qualifiers
- UEFA Conference League Qualifiers
- Relegation Play-off
- Relegation
Numbers in black are golas scored. Gray numbers are conceded goals.